Southern
Sudan Investment And Development Conference
Safari Park Hotel 14-15
March 2006
The
conference attracted a diverse and well-represented group
of investors. Despite the fact that the President and
Vice-President of South Sudan were no able to attend the
conference, The Government of South Sudan (GOSS) was represented
by Ministers related to the key areas of investor interest.
There were also excellent presentations from representatives
of the World Bank, the UN, the EU, the Kenyan government
and international companies and investors.
The
focus of the conference was the future of Southern Sudan
in relation to oil, gas, mining, agriculture and infrastructure
development.
The keynote address given by Albino A. Akol, Minister
of Industry and Mining who stated that although poor to
none-existent infrastructure was the main concern, investment
laws were currently being revised to suit the situation
in Southern Sudan. He also stressed the implementation
of CPA and the set-up of a joint technical body that would
address issues such as transparency in oil field allocations
and demarcations.
Politics
and Investment in Southern Sudan
The
head of delegation for the Europe Commission in Sudan,
Ambassador Kent Degerfelt informed participants of changes
by SPLM from a rebel movement into politics as part of
the institution building. To this end, the EU and Sudan
have normalized relations that have seen €50 million
so far disbursed through the Multi Donor Trust Fund (MTDF)
for food security and education. This is part of the EU
contribution to the development of Sudan of €500
million over 3 years and includes development aid from
EU member states.
He
also reminded that UNMIS would continue to oversee security
arrangements as stipulated in CPA. However, Dr. David
Waithaka, Director of Kenya Southern Sudan Liaison Office
advised GOSS to invest in several areas that include security,
law and order, social services in addition to legal and
regulatory framework. This is in part a desire for regional
integration and cooperation by East Africans.
The
framework for sustainable development as well as investment
structures and procedures drew a lot of attention from
participants largely due to concerns over information
deficiency on what was currently taking place in Southern
Sudan. The Minister of Communication, Trade and Supply
Anthony L. Makana assured participants that GOSS was striving
to provide and ensure an investment climate that was conducive.
To this end, GOSS legislative assembly is meeting on 17th
March 2006 to discuss and review laws that may be hindering
investment.
On
a legal perspective, participants were informed of the
provisions in the CPA that led to the interim constitution.
This serves as a recognized constitution and would be
considered in international law. Danielle Beggs, a partner
in energy, transport and infrastructure group Denton Wilde
Sapte made a presentation on areas investors should pay
particular attention to. This particularly would be right
to ownership of private property, rule of law, specific
foreign investment legislation, tax regime and repatriation
of revenues as well as dispute resolution.
The
lead economist for World Bank, Sudan and Ethiopia Office
Jeni Klugman spoke of the Millennium Development Goals
(MDGs) in which issues such as under age of 5 mortality
rate, access to water, youth (16-24) literacy and boy-girl
ratio were well below acceptable standards. On the contrast,
the economy of Sudan remains robust. Despite the investment
climate, GOSS had several matters to deal with. These
range from agricultural activity to legal and regulatory
priorities such as legislation and banking laws.
For
this reason, humanitarian assistance continues to be the
primary source for service delivery in South Sudan. UN
Deputy Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator for Southern
Sudan, David Gressly talked of the changes taking place
in towns with the development of markets as a result of
freedom of movement. For this reason, investment into
systems such as these will make government viable and
promote the growth of a monetary economy.
As we all know, when it comes to politics and oil management,
the topic that is the ‘curse of oil’ is not
to far away, Jonathan Bearman, managing director of Clearwater
Research Services Ltd reminded. He acknowledged the information
deficit on South Sudan. From data, surveys engineering
reports, geographical studies, water resource studies
to wildlife studies. But, investment potential remains
in agriculture through water management and encouraged
studies to be conducted in forestry assessments and water
management. Noteworthy, was the call for strategic partnerships
for technological transfer to build ‘local content’
such as community development like roads and schools.
Also
present was the chairman of South Sudan chamber of commerce
and industry and agricultural Ngor Ayuel Kacgor. Financing
of the development and managing risk associated.
Infrastructure as well as banking systems is still at
an infancy stage in South Sudan. Financing of development
is largely now being taken in the form of partnerships.
Aggrey Idri, Chief Executive Officer of Nile Commercial
Bank (NCB), highlighted this point. Local investors with
potential to make immediate impact in their communities
(IDPs and returnees) have no collateral to provide for
loan requests. Thereby, current investment will largely
be for infrastructure development. To aid the flow of
finance into South Sudan, Nile Commercial Bank has gone
in partnership with Stanbic.
To
calm the investors’ nerves due to their cautious
nature in approaching South Sudan, Sebastian Willis-Fleming
of Control Risks provided an insight into how investors
should and can go about managing risk in South Sudan evolving
climate. As investors have different risk appetites, they
can manage risk by ensuring they know and understand the
situation, audit at all levels and take responsibility
to the corporate level. Furthermore, if community relations
are applied correctly from the start, then labour relations
will be easier to handle. This in turn will provide for
physical security of personnel and investors.
The
2nd day was set for the oil and gas agenda
John
Luk Jok, Minister for Culture and Youth Affairs and also
member of the National Petroleum Commission (NPC) spoke
of huge potential, as many parts of South Sudan are yet
to be explored despite extraordinary large areas being
previously allocated to oil companies during the war.
The CPA addresses that the oil sector should be sustainable
and thus reiterated the involvement of South Sudanese
in all matters related to development and production of
oil and gas. On a different perspective, Henry Obwocha,
acting Kenyan Energy minister, highlighted the current
heightened interest in East Africa for oil and gas. This
has resulted in several areas being currently explored
for potential.
Continuing
on the oil and gas investment in South Sudan was a presentation
on the responsibilities of government, business and civil
society in the development of Sudan’s oil sector
by European Coalition on Oil in Sudan (ECOS). Egbert Wesselink
reminded participants, particularly oil investors that
they have a moral responsibility in their business case
for peace and justice, in light of the oil sector’s
unsettling legacy. He highlighted the need for financial
transparency and for environmental impact considerations
in the development of the oil industry. This, in other
words, forms part of corporate responsibility.
For
this purpose, oil and gas companies will have to closely
scrutinize the legal and contractual requirements to foster
development. J .Jay Park, a partner in the international
energy group of Macleod Dixon LLP presented an insight
into what oil companies initially look out before venturing
to invest. Thus, they consider petroleum specific legalities,
which determine rights to explore and produce, and ownership
of the production. He commented that South Sudan seemed
to be opting for single window regulation in which bids
and interests are considered through one channel. In this
case, NPC and CPA Chapter III provide the guiding principles
on oil development.
To
underline the change in which the oil industry operates
in is the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
(EITI). Harry Hagan, senior economic adviser Sudan Unit
from the Department for International Development (DFID)
asked how relevant EITI was to the Sudanese context. The
initiative aims at increasing transparency of payments
of oil, gas and mining companies to government as well
as transparency of revenue received by government. In
case of Sudan, CPA states that the wealth of Sudan shall
be shared equitably. In addition SPLM is guaranteed access
to existing oil contracts and there is a 50-50 oil revenue
sharing.
Although
EITI is not compulsory, it has now become an international
standard and governments follow a member of steps before
signing up to EITI in which the issue of local content
is addressed. Under strategies for investment in Sudan’s
mining sector, the minister for Industry and Mining, Albino
A. Akol stated that South Sudan was also about mineral
exploration. To address this, the ministry was involved
in institutional capacity building that includes enactment
of laws such as Mines and Quarries act. The Act will provide
salient points to mineral concessions that range from
dispute resolution procedures to exporting of samples
assay without custom duty. He however noted that South
Sudan remains the least surveyed geographical area.
The
case for requirements and opportunities in infrastructure
and agriculture
This
was strongly put by the minister for Agriculture and Forestry,
Dr. Martin Elia Lomuro in his presentation on the state,
potential and strategy for development of agricultural
and forestry sectors. He informed participants of recent
field studies and research into the potential of agriculture
as the mission to MAF included to develop prioritized
policies in the drive to secure food security. These are
large diversity of crops that can be cultivated and harvested
however forestry is a potential economic vehicle. He stated
that this was degradation of forestry in areas around
Yei but areas like Imatong Mountains remained viable.
He was supported by H. Schar of Volunteers for Economic
Growth Alliance (VEGA) in his presentation on agricultural
market and enterprises development for Southern Sudan.
The
question and answer sessions allowed participants to interact
with the speakers, but the highlight and much anticipated
session was the special oil and gas panel discussion in
which the oil company representatives found themselves
in a defensive position over their past track record.
Of particular target was Marc Jozan of Total as was Stacey
Kivel, vice president Business Development and Legal Affairs
for Equator Exploration Ltd.
On
the other hand Philip Bongani, Head of Government Relations
for PetroSA trumpeted the benefits of 100% government
ownership of a petroleum company and insisted that South
Sudan had nothing to fear in taking on such an approach
towards the oil sector. In this call for local content,
Phil Ward from White Nile Ltd yet again urged for change
in approach in oil business.
In summary, the Southern Sudan Investment and Development
Conference brought together different players to the reconstruction
and development of South Sudan. It highlighted the different
facets to development such as legality and corporate responsibility.
Although the theme was focus on the future, there was
a general feeling that the viability and potential of
investing in South Sudan was large and to a great extent
unknown.
VIEW
CONFERENCE PICTORIAL >>