| Native Administration in the South and the Beginnings of the Nasir Station |
| By
Edward Miner, edward-miner@uiowa.edu
After Egyptian forces led by Lord Kitchener defeated the Mahdists under the command of Khalifa Abdallahi at Omdurman on September 19, 1898, British military attention quickly turned to challenges coming in the Southern Sudan to their control of the Nile River. French forces under Captain Marchand had occupied Fashoda; Belgians were encamped at Rejaf and Lado; and the Abyssianians (Ethiopians) were encroaching along the Baro and Sobat Rivers. Southern Sudanese battalions of the Anglo-Egyptian army were sent to reoccupy old military outposts such as the one at Nasir. With the withdrawal of all three opponents, the British military undertook the task of administering the central Southern region which included the Shilluk, Nuer and Dinka peoples. The Nasir outpost, and the great bulk of the Nuer people, fell into what was first the Fashoda Military District and later the Upper Nile Province. Major H. W. Jackson, the first military governor, established the district headquarters at Fashoda (shortly thereafter renamed Kodok). In 1914, the provincial capital was moved to Malakal. Since the administration of the Southern provinces was not a priority
in Cairo or Khartoum, the transition from military to civil administration
would take the better part of three decades. The first civilian governor
of Upper Nile Province, K.C.P. Struve, was not appointed until 1919, and
the military continued to play a key role in administration until the
finalization of the provincial borders in 1929. The Sudan Civil Service,
formed in 1899, recruited exclusively from the ranks of the British, Egyptian
and Northern Sudanese officers of the Sudanese battalions of the Egyptian
army. 'Seconded' for short-term contracts from their permanent military
assignments, these officers seldom gained much knowledge of Southern Sudanese
languages or political structures. Already on reassignment from British
regiments to the Egyptian army, British officers were The Anglo-Egyptian partnership in the Sudan was an exceedingly delicate
one. Justification for a British presence rested in theory on their protection
of Egyptian territorial interests in a unified Sudan. The years following
World War I saw increasing resistance to British colonialism in all of
the former territories of the Ottoman Empire (within which Egypt had existed
as an autonomous entity since the time of Viceroy Muhammad 'Ali, even
while under British 'protection'). With vital British interests implicated
in control of As early as 1921, governance in the South began to take its cue from
the Milner Report, which had laid out the principles of Native Administration.
Senior inspectors now became deputy governors and their duties more closely
tied to the provincial capitals; inspectors became district and assistant
district commissioners, and interfaced directly with Shilluk, Nuer and
Dinka 'leaders' (however created); and the Arabic-speaking class of local The logic of native administration, which ultimately led in 1930 to the
formulation of the Southern Policy of separate development between North
and South, was that much routine administration could be done through
local authorities, using customary structures and law, and in so far as
these could be co-opted by government. Much of this had been implicit
in administration from the start; everywhere 'legitimate' chiefs had been
sought out, especially in the North, to replace the functionaries of the
Mahdist regime, which was characterized as having usurped the authority
of traditional rulers. Even in Upper Nile a code of Dinka 'law' had beenproduced
in the province as early as 1906. Much of the administrative activity
throughout the Sudan in the 1920s and early 1930s was spent in When C.A. Willis succeeded Struve in 1926, he would extend the principles
of Native Administration in ways much less conciliatory than his predecessor.
His prior experience came as the former director of the Intelligence Department
in Khartoum, and was tainted by his perceived failing in that capacity
with respect to the 1924 mutinies (Johnson 1995: 13). As Governor of the
Upper Nile Province, Willis was prone to override many of the suggestions
of his District Commissioners; his policies were driven by ideology rather
than practical experience. The good relations that Struve's District Commissioners
had cultivated among Nuer prophets and other notables would be squandered.
The most disastrous consequence of his extreme .there was an office of 'chief' among the Nuer which had been undermined
or usurped by the 'kujurs' [prophets] (an assumption subsequently exploded
by Evans-Pritchard's research). Once the confrontation which he initiated To minimize the potential for contention between missionary societies,
Khartoum divided the three Southern provinces (Upper Nile, Bahr al-Ghazal,
and Mongalla) into spheres of influence. The American Presbyterian Mission
(APM), headquartered in New York, was offered some of the most difficult
territory for evangelism in the culturally conservative, Nilotic-speaking The Condominium government was keen, however, to recruit the APM to an
effort to open up communication with the Eastern Nuer; to that end, another
mission station was established at Nasir on the Sobat River (near the
Ethiopian border) in 1913. As at the Doleib Hill station, the focus of
activity was initially on industrial and agricultural training and production;
but by 1916, the Nasir missionaries were conversant enough in Nuer to
teach local children how to read and write their own language. By Heasty was an expert in the teaching of English; Miss Huffman produced
'graded text-books' and made a significant contribution to Nuer linguistic
studies. Indeed, once the commitment to academic education had been fully
accepted, the Americans set about fulfilling it with the energy and thoroughly
practical competence which had marked their earlier dedication to industrial
work. Although the Mission still remained a small-scale concern, by the
1930s the quality of its education work was widely acknowledged. Sentiments
at the Civil Secretariat in Khartoum against literary education By April 1928, when the 'Rejaf Language Conference' met under Matthew's
[the Secretary of Education] chairmanship, Maffey [the Governor-General]
had evidently ceased to press for the adoption of Arabic. Matthew, in
his keynote speech from the Chair, deplored 'the increasing spread of
pidgin Arabic, a jargon severely limited in its means of expression',
and therefore Crucially for the success of mission education, the new Southern Policy and its use of English in administration meant that graduates of the mission schools were positively positioned for entry into and advancement in the civil service. Sanderson and Sanderson (1981: 158) write: Thanks to the enormous prestige and authority which Government had by now acquired among most Southern peoples, the dissemination of a belief that it approved of education could indeed be expected to improve school attendance. To send a son to school would now seem less a pointless exercise, especially for a notable who was (as many increasingly were) anxious to retain the goodwill of his local governor or DC [District Commissioner]. Moreover, some officials 'drafted' boys directly into school. In 1927 Governor Willis of Upper Nile Province sent six young Nuer to the Americans at Nasir; three of them already interpreters to DCs and the other three were being trained for similar posts.
During the World War II years, the South saw little growth in the training of teachers or in school enrollments. Although "the overall expenditure of the Education Department increased by over 80%.almost all of this growth took place in the Northern Sudan" (Sanderson and Sanderson 1981: 233). The problem was not so much a lack of available funds, but of personnel. There was an increasing awareness that the Southern Policy had failed in its major objectives, which had been to develop the economy of the South in isolation from the North and to prepare it politically for independence. Criticisms pointed to the strategy of culturally isolating Southern peoples from one another and from the North as a key reason for the failure to develop a sufficient cadre of Southern Sudanese civil servants and teachers. Moreover, it was beginning to dawn on some British administrators that independence would come sooner rather than later, and that long-term approaches to development would not address the immediate problem. The 'detribalization' that the strategy of Native Administration had been designed to prevent was no longer widely viewed as the most pressing threat to the future of the South. The greater threat was that the region did not possess a pool of educated political leadership or the level of economic development that would inoculate it against Northern hegemony. The Civil Secretariat would respond to these criticisms with the opening of government secondary and teacher training schools, but attend to such initiatives as though an independent Sudan were still several decades away. For the British, the political future of the South would take a backseat to its strategic interests in delegitimating Egyptian claims against Sudanese sovereignty. To this end, from 1945, anti-Egyptian sentiment within Northern Sudanese nationalism was exploited to justify a continued British presence. This strategy would ultimately, however, backfire by generating increased anti-British sentiment in the North. In this context, the coveted notion of the ultimate annexation of the South to Uganda became inimical to British strategic interests. In 1946, the Civil Secretary officially reversed the Southern Policy of separate development. Sanderson and Sanderson (1981: 294) write: In his circular of 16 December 1946 the Civil Secretary called for the
revision of an obsolete Southern Policy, in response to recent political
developments both inside and outside of the Sudan; and for the re-statement
of policy 'in a form which can be publicly explained and supported' and
which would be acceptable to Northern Sudanese opinion. This revision
implied that the Southern Sudan should henceforth be regarded as 'inextricably
bound for future development to the middle-eastern and With the administrative and trade barriers to Arabic and Islamic influence
now removed, the several mission organizations cooperated in various ways
to stem these influences, but were ultimately unsuccessful. Their ability
to form effective alliances were compromised in part by increased tensions
between Protestant and Catholic missions due to their mutual croachments Despite its small size relative to the other mission organizations, the APM distinguished itself in its resistance to encroaching government control in these years. Its relative weakness, however, was its reluctance to ordain enough Southern Sudanese pastors for its churches to be self-sustaining. Sanderson and Sanderson (1981: 390-1) write: The American Mission, with its almost aggressive buoyancy and strong commitment to direct evangelism, evidently found it more difficult than the CMS [Christian Missionary Society] to practise 'deliberate conscientious obedience to "the Powers that be ordained by God"'. Its more outspoken opposition to Government cost it 'at least nine' expulsions before the general expulsion of March 1964. In spite of these expulsions, and the virtual impossibility after 1958 of obtaining entry permits, the Mission still had in 1964 twelve missionaries engaged in medical and evangelist work in the Southern Sudan, in addition to McClure and his team in Ethiopia. Much of this work was in new, or very weakly developed fields, where even in the 1950s and 1960s the activity of the missionary himself was still crucially important. The small indigenous 'Church of Christ on the Upper Nile' was moreover hardly self-sustaining. The Americans were, for these and possibly other reasons, more reluctant than the CMS to delegate ecclesiastical authority to the Sudanese. Even as late as 1960 they had ordained only 'three or four' Sudanese pastors. Their Church was moreover organized as a single Presbytery under a moderator elected for three years - a centralized structure unlikely to encourage missionaries to see themselves simply as auxiliaries to the local Church.
(http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/collections/nuer/edward/nasir.html) |